Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Florent Diep vs Tak Khunn Wang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Diep vs Wang analysis and find out who is favored!
Florent Diep vs Tak Khunn Wang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Diep 1 - 0 Wang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Diep has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Wang has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Diep, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wang has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Diep has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wang has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Diep has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Wang winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Diep has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 141/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6). Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 75/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 47/ 58).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Diep winning 1 times and Wang being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Diep winning 2 and Wang winning 0. The last match between Diep and Wang was at the Tunisia F9 (Jerba), 06-03-2018, First, Hard with Florent Diep getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Diep and Wang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Diep winning 0 times and Wang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Diep winning 1, and Wang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Diep has played against opponents with an average rank of while Wang has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Diep has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Diep has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
592
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
859
Rank
265
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
51% (176-171)
Career Total W/L
58% (337-244)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Florent Diep vs Tak Khunn Wang For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Diep VS Wang
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Florent Diep | Tak Khunn Wang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (34/57) | 63% (39/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (28/34) | 69% (27/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (12/23) | 48% (11/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (24/62) | 30% (17/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Florent Diep
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Florent Diep | Tak Khunn Wang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Florent Diep Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Petit
Player
Florent Diep
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Florent Diep
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Diep
Player
Anis Ghorbel
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Ignacio Alcalde
Player
Florent Diep
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Petit
Player
Florent Diep
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Florent Diep
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Florent Diep
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
0
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
42 of
50)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Florent Diep
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(8) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Diep
Player
Lucas Catarina
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Florent Diep
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tak Khunn Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
15
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Baptiste Crepatte
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Yannick Mertens
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
22
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
115)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Matt Ponchet
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Leopold Zima
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
17
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mick Veldheer
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Diep Vs Wang Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Diep are available here and Wang photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
